« August 2006 | Main | October 2006 »
September 29, 2006
Evolution and Original Sin
Lee at Verbum Ipsum has a great post on Keith Ward's Religion and Human Nature. He offers a compelling discussion on the harmony between evolution and the doctrine of original sin. I admit, for a long time I have been one who quickly considers the story of creation and fall just a myth that points to how things will be. I like Ward's conception better though, I think.
Posted by mattalexander at 3:10 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
September 26, 2006
The Part D Debacle
So, I think most informed people would agree that the Medicare Modernization Act has turned out to be a disaster. Not only did it confuse countless seniors in this country, it screwed many financially and medically. The New England Journal of Medicine, or the "The Journal" in my world :), published two sides of the story in its recent issue. The first is essentially the party line offered by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It's pretty bland and seems harmless enough. They even admit some mistakes, a rarity in American politics these days. The second is from Rep. Louise Slaughter of NY. It made my blood boil. The cronyism in this bill, which really had little to do with the nation's health, is so frustrating. Keep in mind, the profits of the nine pharmaceutical companies in the fortune 500 are larger than the profits of the rest of the fortune 500 COMBINED. They make oil look like poor earners. It is well past time that our nation considered the merits of putting our health in the marketplace.
Posted by mattalexander at 9:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
More Bubba
Thanks to David for a link to video of Clinton on Fox News Sunday, which I posted about previously. See the video here. Really amazing stuff.
Posted by mattalexander at 6:24 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
September 25, 2006
A Few Links
Fox News had Bill Clinton on the other day for they Sunday morning bobbleheads show. The agreement was that they'd discuss that the Clinton Foundation has raised over $7Billion to fight the worlds biggest problems, including climate change, global health, eliminating poverty, and religious and ethnic strife. (Quite a list, eh?) Well, it only took Fox's Chris Wallace until the second question to break from the plan. Wallace tried to pounce on Clinton for not putting Bin Laden and Al Qaeda "out of business." Well, Clinton absolutely skewered him and his pitiful network. And good for him. It's ridiculous both that neocons spew these patently false accusations and that democrats let them get away with it. It's not surprising Clinton is the only Democrat elected president lately. Nobody else has shown half the spine, and hasn't exactly set the bar high.
Anyway, on the topic of Democrats, it seems a leaked intel report suggests this country needs new leadership. Uh, duh. Let's see how this gets treated in the doldrums of the MSM.
Finally, I'm embedding a video clip of a CBS Evening News story on Evangelical Christians and politics. I came across this at the new God's Politicsblog. I think Jim Wallis came out looking much more reasonable than those he was pitted against. Then again, just about anyone comes out looking more reasonable than the pompous jerks at the Family Research Council.
Posted by mattalexander at 4:12 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
What is it About Blowing Stuff Up...
...that is so awesome?
Posted by mattalexander at 4:11 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
September 22, 2006
Torture
How far have we fallen when our lawmakers celebrate a "compromise" that condones torture and simultaneously defecates on the Constitution and the Geneva Convention? Check out this great WaPo piece by Vladimir Bukovsky, who knows quite a bit about torture.
Posted by mattalexander at 7:39 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
September 21, 2006
Get Over It
I'd be a much bigger OU fan if it weren't for the behavior of many of their fans. For those of you who don't follow college football closely, OU recently lost a game to Oregon in which a couple controversial calls late in the game were made. Now, I'm a Pac-10 fan, but I'm not going to pretend the officials blew the call. It's unfortunate, but deal with it. Blown calls have happened before, and they'll happen again. Remember, OU, after losing the onside kick, still allowed Oregon to drive and score. Yeah, yeah, I know there was a controversial penalty, but OU still gave up a touchdown quite quickly and easily. Also, despite the controversial onside ruling, OU still had a chance to win the game. The bellyaching about the refs holds a lot less merit alongside the blown field goal as time expired. OU had a good team going into this game, and they will still be a good team each weekend this fall. It's time to move on. Unfortunately, many in Norman still don't think so. Even David Boren, OU's president, has gotten into the fray, suggesting the game result be nullified and the officials involved suspended. This is ludicrous. Does Boren not have bigger fish to fry? Seriously, at this point it's only making the university look bad. When a meathead football commentator for ESPN calls you out for bloviating about football rather than focusing on academics and other important responsibilities, you REALLY need to get over it. When the replay official involved has to take a leave of absence due to mental trauma from harassment, including death threats and threats against his children, you REALLY REALLY REALLY need to get over it. It's time for spoiled Sooner fans to examine their priorities.
Posted by mattalexander at 10:11 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
September 18, 2006
Scary...
Onward to Iran? From TPM. Would they really try to pull this? I think a part of me still doesn't get it if I have to ask this question. I sure hope we can stop this one befoer it happens. At the risk of partisanship, a Democratic majority in the Senate and the House would be a good start. If this goes through soon though, I'm afraid fear could easily win yet another election cycle.
Posted by mattalexander at 10:43 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
September 15, 2006
Benedict's Offensive(?) Words
So here's more that caused me to ponder the questions I asked in my previous post. In the pope's trip home to Germany, he gave a very academic lecture that has caught the attention of many. In addition to the debate over the substance of the speech, I find some coverage frustrating.
Compare the different headlines between Time and CNN. The former's reads, The Pope Tackles Faith and Terrorism, while the latter's reads, Muslim fury at pope jihad comments. I don't think it's solely because I'm a Christian that I find Time's the better reporting. They portray his lecture as concerted mental wrangling about theological underpinnings of Christianity and Islam. CNN, on the other hand, didn't really cover the speech on its own, as far as I can find. Rather, they chose to go straight to coverage of the vociferous response in some muslim areas. Now, I'm not to say protestors ought not take offense, but the coverage this article gives seems unwarranted. The only suggestion they offer at the size of the protests is the 100 who rallied in Cairo. That just doesn't seem like a huge turnout, particularly compared to other anti-Western demonstrations like the response to the Danish cartoons several months ago. Also, they propose an unsubstantiated claim that an attack on an Orthodox church in Gaza might have been related. That suggestion just seems irresponsible, and I think they're just trying to over-report on a conflict that arguably barely exists.
While I am not overly optimistic that ecumenical movements can accomplish tons in the future, I think coverage like CNN's, unfortunately too typical of cable news these days, hurts interfaith discussions. We might not convert one another, but more level-headed discussion can go a long way to help us live peacefully next to one another in the shrinking global community.
As for the content of the pope's speech, his question was quite compelling. He pondered whether a Christian conception of God as logos--thus strongly rational--versus a muslim conception of God as utterly transcendent--and not as bound by reason--might yield a difference between the two faiths, i.e. irrational events, such as suicide to promote the faith, can be justified theologically. This distinction is one I hadn't ever considered before, and it's worth pondering. I also appreciated his candid deliberation of whether the Christian concept of God is valid or overly Hellenistic and irredeemable. Regardless where such thought might go, he probably could have used a less extreme example than the quote that has caused the uproar.
Update: Pastor John has great summary and analysis of Benedict's speech here.
Posted by mattalexander at 6:44 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack
September 14, 2006
Prosperity Theology in the MSM
Anybody catch the cover of the new issue of Time? CNN has a summary of the cover story here. I increasingly find myself disturbed by portrayal of Christianity in the media and popular culture these days. Only 1/6 of American Christians (still way too high!) consider themselves in line with this type of thinking, but they seem to get a lot more playtime than that. I guess I also tend to lump these folks in with the republican, Left Behind, warmongering, gay-hating, types. Is it that Christians are getting a bad wrap, or have most just wandered that far from the Gospel? Probably some of both, in my opinion. I find myself taking that position a lot in conversations at school these days, although I find it a bit tough to proceed sometimes as a radical orthodoxy nerd who considers apologetics misguided and futile. : ) I'm curious to hear what others think.
Posted by mattalexander at 9:59 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
Olbermann on 9/11
I saw a lot of reference to this piece on the blogosphere, and I finally got around to reading it. It's fantastic. I've also posted the text below the fold.
In today's Orwellian media, his is one of few voices of reason that have not fallen in step with the Fox News school of broadcasting. Pretty somber stuff, but certainly worth watching. I've been reticent to comment on 9/11. As a recently adopted New Yorker, I hurt more when I think of 9/11, but I also feel it's not my place to bloviate about it given that I wasn't here on that horrible day. But when I see clips on TV, both pre- and post-9/11, and recognize the building where my wife worked merely a couple blocks from ground zero, the sidewalk along the Hudson where we love to take visitors to see the Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island, the tribute in light we can see from our windows, or any of the other mundane locations part of what is now our home city, it takes all I am to keep from feeling overwhelming rage when those bastards start exploiting this tragedy, and international goodwill following it, for political gain. Please watch the video; he states things better than I could hope.
Half a lifetime ago, I worked in this now-empty space. And for 40 days after the attacks, I worked here again, trying to make sense of what happened, and was yet to happen, as a reporter.
All the time, I knew that the very air I breathed contained the remains of thousands of people, including four of my friends, two in the planes and -- as I discovered from those "missing posters" seared still into my soul -- two more in the Towers.
And I knew too, that this was the pyre for hundreds of New York policemen and firemen, of whom my family can claim half a dozen or more, as our ancestors.
I belabor this to emphasize that, for me this was, and is, and always shall be, personal.
And anyone who claims that I and others like me are "soft,"or have "forgotten" the lessons of what happened here is at best a grasping, opportunistic, dilettante and at worst, an idiot whether he is a commentator, or a Vice President, or a President.
However, of all the things those of us who were here five years ago could have forecast -- of all the nightmares that unfolded before our eyes, and the others that unfolded only in our minds -- none of us could have predicted this.
Five years later this space is still empty.
Five years later there is no memorial to the dead.
Five years later there is no building rising to show with proud defiance that we would not have our America wrung from us, by cowards and criminals.
Five years later this country's wound is still open.
Five years later this country's mass grave is still unmarked.
Five years later this is still just a background for a photo-op.
It is beyond shameful.
At the dedication of the Gettysburg Memorial -- barely four months after the last soldier staggered from another Pennsylvania field -- Mr. Lincoln said, "we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract."
Lincoln used those words to immortalize their sacrifice.
Today our leaders could use those same words to rationalize their reprehensible inaction. "We cannot dedicate, we can not consecrate, we can not hallow this ground." So we won't.
Instead they bicker and buck pass. They thwart private efforts, and jostle to claim credit for initiatives that go nowhere. They spend the money on irrelevant wars, and elaborate self-congratulations, and buying off columnists to write how good a job they're doing instead of doing any job at all.
Five years later, Mr. Bush, we are still fighting the terrorists on these streets. And look carefully, sir, on these 16 empty acres. The terrorists are clearly, still winning.
And, in a crime against every victim here and every patriotic sentiment you mouthed but did not enact, you have done nothing about it.
And there is something worse still than this vast gaping hole in this city, and in the fabric of our nation. There is its symbolism of the promise unfulfilled, the urgent oath, reduced to lazy execution.
The only positive on 9/11 and the days and weeks that so slowly and painfully followed it was the unanimous humanity, here, and throughout the country. The government, the President in particular, was given every possible measure of support.
Those who did not belong to his party -- tabled that.
Those who doubted the mechanics of his election -- ignored that.
Those who wondered of his qualifications -- forgot that.
History teaches us that nearly unanimous support of a government cannot be taken away from that government by its critics. It can only be squandered by those who use it not to heal a nation's wounds, but to take political advantage.
Terrorists did not come and steal our newly-regained sense of being American first, and political, fiftieth. Nor did the Democrats. Nor did the media. Nor did the people.
The President -- and those around him -- did that.
They promised bi-partisanship, and then showed that to them, "bi-partisanship" meant that their party would rule and the rest would have to follow, or be branded, with ever-escalating hysteria, as morally or intellectually confused, as appeasers, as those who, in the Vice President's words yesterday, "validate the strategy of the terrorists."
They promised protection, and then showed that to them "protection" meant going to war against a despot whose hand they had once shaken, a despot who we now learn from our own Senate Intelligence Committee, hated al-Qaida as much as we did.
The polite phrase for how so many of us were duped into supporting a war, on the false premise that it had 'something to do' with 9/11 is "lying by implication."
The impolite phrase is "impeachable offense."
Not once in now five years has this President ever offered to assume responsibility for the failures that led to this empty space, and to this, the current, curdled, version of our beloved country.
Still, there is a last snapping flame from a final candle of respect and fairness: even his most virulent critics have never suggested he alone bears the full brunt of the blame for 9/11.
Half the time, in fact, this President has been so gently treated, that he has seemed not even to be the man most responsible for anything in his own administration.
Yet what is happening this very night?
A mini-series, created, influenced -- possibly financed by -- the most radical and cold of domestic political Machiavellis, continues to be televised into our homes.
The documented truths of the last fifteen years are replaced by bald-faced lies; the talking points of the current regime parroted; the whole sorry story blurred, by spin, to make the party out of office seem vacillating and impotent, and the party in office, seem like the only option.
How dare you, Mr. President, after taking cynical advantage of the unanimity and love, and transmuting it into fraudulent war and needless death, after monstrously transforming it into fear and suspicion and turning that fear into the campaign slogan of three elections? How dare you -- or those around you -- ever "spin" 9/11?
Just as the terrorists have succeeded -- are still succeeding -- as long as there is no memorial and no construction here at Ground Zero.
So, too, have they succeeded, and are still succeeding as long as this government uses 9/11 as a wedge to pit Americans against Americans.
This is an odd point to cite a television program, especially one from March of 1960. But as Disney's continuing sell-out of the truth (and this country) suggests, even television programs can be powerful things.
And long ago, a series called "The Twilight Zone" broadcast a riveting episode entitled "The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street."
In brief: a meteor sparks rumors of an invasion by extra-terrestrials disguised as humans. The electricity goes out. A neighbor pleads for calm. Suddenly his car -- and only his car -- starts. Someone suggests he must be the alien. Then another man's lights go on. As charges and suspicion and panic overtake the street, guns are inevitably produced. An "alien" is shot -- but he turns out to be just another neighbor, returning from going for help. The camera pulls back to a near-by hill, where two extra-terrestrials are seen manipulating a small device that can jam electricity. The veteran tells his novice that there's no need to actually attack, that you just turn off a few of the human machines and then, "they pick the most dangerous enemy they can find, and it's themselves."
And then, in perhaps his finest piece of writing, Rod Serling sums it up with words of remarkable prescience, given where we find ourselves tonight: "The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, prejudices, to be found only in the minds of men.
"For the record, prejudices can kill and suspicion can destroy, and a thoughtless, frightened search for a scapegoat has a fallout all its own -- for the children, and the children yet unborn."
When those who dissent are told time and time again -- as we will be, if not tonight by the President, then tomorrow by his portable public chorus -- that he is preserving our freedom, but that if we use any of it, we are somehow un-American...When we are scolded, that if we merely question, we have "forgotten the lessons of 9/11"... look into this empty space behind me and the bi-partisanship upon which this administration also did not build, and tell me:
Who has left this hole in the ground?
We have not forgotten, Mr. President.
You have.
May this country forgive you.
Posted by mattalexander at 2:05 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
September 6, 2006
English Analogies
I got this forward from a friend at school. Priceless...
Every year, English teachers from across the country can submit their
collections of actual analogies and metaphors found in high school
essays. These excerpts are published each year to the amusement of
teachers across the country. Here are last years winners....
1. Her face was a perfect oval, like a circle that had its two
sides gently compressed by a Thigh Master.
2. His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking alliances
like underpants in a dryer without Cling Free.
3. He spoke with the wisdom that can only come from experience,
like a guy who went blind because he looked at a solar eclipse without
one of those boxes with a pinhole in it and now goes around the country
speaking at high schools about the dangers of looking at a solar eclipse
without one of those boxes with a pinhole in it.
4. She grew on him like she was a colony of E. coli, and he was
room-temperature Canadian beef.
5. She had a deep, throaty, genuine laugh, like that sound a dog
makes just before it throws up.
6. Her vocabulary was as bad as, like, whatever.
7. He was as tall as a six-foot, three-inch tree.
8. The revelation that his marriage of 30 years had disintegrated
because of his wife's infidelity came as a rude shock, like a surcharge
at a formerly surcharge-free ATM machine.
9. The little boat gently drifted across the pond exactly the way
a bowling ball wouldnt.
10. McBride fell 12 stories, hitting the pavement like a Hefty bag
filled with vegetable soup.
11. From the attic came an unearthly howl. The whole scene had an
eerie, surreal quality, like when youre on vacation in another city and
Jeopardy comes on at 7:00 p.m. instead of 7:30.
12. Her hair glistened in the rain like a nose hair after a sneeze.
13. The hailstones leaped from the pavement, just like maggots when
you fry them in hot grease.
14. Long separated by cruel fate, the star-crossed lovers raced across
the grassy field toward each other like two freight trains, one having
left Cleveland at 6:36 p.m. traveling at 55 mph, the other from Topeka
at 4:19 p.m. at a speed of 35 mph.
15. They lived in a typical suburban neighborhood with picket fences
that resembled Nancy Kerrigans teeth.
16. John and Mary had never met. They were like two hummingbirds who
had also never met.
17. He fell for her like his heart was a mob informant, and she was
the East River.
18. Even in his last years, Granddad had a mind like a steel trap,
only one that had been left out so long, it had rusted shut.
19. Shots rang out, as shots are wont to do.
20. The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike
Phil, this plan just might work.
21. The young fighter had a hungry look, the kind you get from not
eating for a while.
22. He was as lame as a duck. Not the metaphorical lame duck, either,
but a real duck that was actually lame, maybe from stepping on a land
mine or something.
23. The ballerina rose gracefully en Pointe and extended one slender
leg behind her, like a dog at a fire hydrant.
24. It was an American tradition, like fathers chasing kids around
with power tools.
25. He was deeply in love. When she spoke, he thought he heard bells,
as if she were a garbage truck backing up.
Posted by mattalexander at 6:24 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack
September 5, 2006
Concealed Weapons Laws
This is a great editorial in the Times today about concealed weapons laws. I remember when one of these passed years ago in Oklahoma. Back then I wasn't too shocked that it passed since many Okies are, well, crazy. But today 36 states have such laws. 36! What is wrong with this country?
Posted by mattalexander at 6:55 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

